Julián Huertas
19 February 2015
Professor Musgrave
Garden Art in European History
Blog Post Two:
In the three cultures we have so far studied – Roman,
Mediæval and Muslim – how did/does the garden play a role in their respective
religions?
In Roman, Mediæval,
and Muslim cultures, the garden has played a role in representing and
celebrating the respective religions in similar and different ways. In this
blog post, I will explore those similarities and differences.
The
garden in Roman culture served as a form of religious expression and
incorporating of deities into human activities. Within Roman peristyle gardens,
many of the fountains and statuary are of deities. Specific deities found in
Roman gods would be Pomona and Venus. There were additionally various nymphaea,
which were shrines to nymphs of the gardens. Fresco paintings on the side-walls of gardens additionally
showed deities relaxing in or performing activities in the gardens themselves.
Mediæval
gardens that served religion were primarily monastic, as plebian gardens were utilitarian
and royal/noble gardens were primarily orchards, parks, and/or herbers. Many of
the mediæval gardens were cloisters, which heavily symbolized the purity of the
Garden of Eden. Many of the plants
within these gardens symbolized aspects of the Virgin Mary. The white lily represented
the virgin’s purity and the red rose symbolized the virgin’s birth of Christ. A
smaller garden separate from the cloisters but within the abbey grounds was the
hortus conclusus (“enclosed garden”).
This was heavily sacred and usually locked. It was a quiet, private spot that
was heavily ornamented. These pure,
sacred aspects of the garden appealed to the idea of the cloisters as the
Garden of Eden.
Muslim
gardens represented religion as they directly referenced Islam as a faith. In
its text, Qur’an gives a blueprint of the design of a garden. Specifically,
there are over one-hundred and twenty references in the Qur’an to the jannah al-firdaws (“gardens of paradise”).
In this sense, the garden should be like the “paradise” like that of the afterlife.
Specifically in regard to design, there
should be a fourfold design (chahar bagh),
water channels, a qanat irrigation
system, central pool, and plane trees (chenar). The
four rills, small narrow water courses, represented the four rivers of life. It
stimulated an individual’s own spiritual reflection in relation to self and to
god. In this way, the Islamic garden should be an earthly and spiritual paradise.
All
three religions similarly have gardens as central components to each respective
faith. The differences, however, are that the Roman garden was less symbolic
and referenced the many deities, whereas the mediæval gardens were heavily
symbolic. Islamic gardens differed in that the sacred text of the Qur’an gave a
blueprint for the design yet was similar in that it represented a spiritual
paradise.
Here is a for the Metropolitan Museum
of Art’s blog. Specifically, this link talks about the plant symbolism within Mediæval
horti conclusi.
Roman garden fresco of a deity within a
garden
|
A hortus conclusus in the Little Sparta garden in Dunsyre, Scotland |
The charah bagh garden designed from the text of the Qur’an in an Islamic garden |
No comments:
Post a Comment